To
Get the Best Deal, Understand What Speakers Want
By Ed Rigsbee, CSP
(1430
words)
Sure, you want the best
possible speaker for whatever your budget might be. A dynamic or
informative speaker generally is a stellar investment in the success of
your meeting. But, sometimes your budget is not enough for the speaker
you want. What’s the solution? Hire a less expensive speaker—squeeze
the speaker you want for a better price—think beyond conventional
wisdom?
Thinking beyond
conventional wisdom might look like, limiting the number of speakers at
your meeting. It is always less expensive to have a single speaker do
several sessions than to have several speakers present a single session
each. Not that every speaker is capable of presenting multiple sessions,
however because of the multiple travel and hotel rooms cost, sometimes
it is even cheaper to hire a speaker to deliver multiple programs than
to have several non-paid speakers participate in your meeting. Even if
these unpaid speakers drive in, thereby eliminating their airline
travel expense, they will still want a free hotel room for the
conference and free registration. Perhaps they were going to come
anyway? You would have then received their conference registration
dollars. Sometimes the true cost of non-paid speakers is staggeringly
hidden.
Let’s explore the
difference between a professional speaker presenting the same program
multiple times vs. presenting multiple programs. The big difference for
the speaker is preparation time—including: research, handout
development and PowerPoint preparation. Unfortunately, few meeting
planners take this key time issue into consideration. Speakers are
selling both their knowledge and their time. The latter is finite, so
the more you consume, the more you should expect to pay. In paying for a
speaker’s time, you have to consider presentation time, travel time
and preparation time. Unless of course you want a canned speech, then
the preparation time is not an issue. Before you jump on the cost
savings of a canned speech, remember that today, few attendees will
tolerate a canned speech.
This idea of a single
speaker presenting multiple presentations for a single fee is growing in
the world of professional speakers but is counter to standard operating
procedures for most speaker bureaus. If you like this idea, you might
have to abandon the ease in speaker selection that you have enjoyed when
working with bureaus.
The Bureau Conundrum
Speaker Bureaus provide
a valuable outsource service for meeting planners that are time
squeezed. A planner can contact a bureau, give their budget and the
bureau will take it from there. For planners that have to fill a large
number of conference session slots and do not have sufficient
staff—bureaus can be their solution. Yet, there are many more speakers
that are under or non-represented by speakers’ bureaus, than there are
speakers that they recommend. Most bureaus only have a small corral of
speakers that they can easily sell and therefore will generally
recommend them first. Many of the underrepresented speakers are quite
good and are a tremendous value.
Another component to
consider is that some bureaus serve two masters. What I mean can be
illustrated by a recent conversation I had with a planner from a very
large biotechnology manufacturer at a meeting industry trends summit. We
were chatting at the event’s evening cocktail party and the planner
was bemoaning about a request for a speaker that she submitted to a very
large East Coast speaker bureau. The planner went on to tell me that the
information sheets for the speakers that this particular bureau sent
her, had no relationship to her submitted speaker request. The planner
was upset that the bureau didn’t pay heed to what she requested. I
explained to the planner about that particular bureau specialized in
speaker exclusives—meaning that the bureau was the only place through
which a particular speaker could be booked. As such, the bureau would
recommend their exclusive speakers first, and if none were selected,
would then recommend other speakers—even when a non-exclusive speaker
would have been a better fit. Unfortunately, this trend is spreading
through the speaker bureau industry.
For most speakers,
speaker bureaus are but one of the many channels by which they go to
market. Speaker bureaus need to be viewed as one would view any
distributor or sales agency. If two-step distribution serves your needs,
and there are a number of reasons that it might, then by all means
select that method.
The conventional
marketing message espoused my most bureaus is that for speaker X,
you’ll pay the same price through us as you would booking speaker X
direct. That is a nice ideal that frequently may be true. Yet, in a
supply chain where a distributor or manufacturer’s representative
sales agency receives 25 to 30 percent, the reality is generally not
quite the ideal. There was a reason behind Sam Walton championing the
idea of Wal-Mart working directly with manufacturers, thereby
eliminating the distributors. This was a necessary strategy in order for
him to continually deliver low prices to his Wal-Mart customers.
Go Direct?
If you should select to
work directly with a speaker, the price you will assuredly pay is time.
Time both in your search and selection process as will as time working
with the speaker on meeting logistics. If this route is best for you,
there are a number of advantages that could make your time investment a
profitable one. Some of the benefits to you could be, no lost
communication through an intermediary, better negotiation possibilities
(the Sam Walton dynamic) and the speaker offering programming ideas and
insight that most likely would have never been transmitted through a
third party.
Searching for a speaker
directly has never been easier. To start, there are a number if Internet
search engines that will do a magnificent job in searching for a speaker
by topic or keyword. Remember to look past the first search page because
that is most likely where you are going to find the speaker bargains. A
great source to aid your search is the Web Site of the National Speakers
Association (NSA).
National Speakers Association
NSA is an alternative
method for finding speakers. NSA has an open online search capability
that anyone can access at www.nsaspeaker.org.
It is true that only members of NSA are listed, which does limit your
possibilities just a bit, but nonetheless you will find that the NSA Web
Site a valuable source in your search for the right speaker. NSA offers
its members a certification called Certified Speaking Professional
(CSP). While the CSP designation does not guarantee a speaker’s
success at your meeting, the process through which a speaker goes to
receive a CSP designation is not an easy one. The CSP is a good
indicator that the speaker is truly a professional.
Approaching the Speaker
Never approach a
speaker, out of the gate, by asking if they negotiate their fees! What
the speaker hears is, “I’m calling to ask you for a discount and
offer nothing in return.” That’s a turn-off in anybody’s book.
Besides, everything in life is a negotiation—just assume that they
will. A better approach is to first talk with the speaker about what you
want—engage them in conversation. After they have affirmed that they
can deliver what you want, then move into the “we have a budget
issue” phase. Do this by first suggesting some of the things your
organization can do for the speaker to create extra value for them. Also
ask the speaker what creates value in their life. Perhaps you have value
to offer a speaker that you had never realized? What do you have that
costs you very little but delivers high value to professional speakers?
Keynote Vs. Breakout
Believe it or not, more
speakers will be willing to talk to you about your budget challenges
when you are talking general session (meaning that there is no other
session competing at the same time) vs. breakout or concurrent sessions.
The reason for this is exposure and product selling capability. If a
speaker is going to fly across the country to speak at a meeting, which
do you think is more valuable to the speaker—speaking to 40 people, or
400? Naturally, it is the 400. More people that could potentially
recommend the speaker for future events and more product will surely be
sold to 400 people than to 40—but, rarely do planners think about
this.
In making your decision
about how to acquire your next speaker, I hope the above has stimulated
your thinking beyond conventional wisdom.
# # #
Ed Rigsbee, CSP
helps trade associations to access their strategic advantage through
collaboration. He is the author of PartnerShift,
Developing Strategic Alliances
and The Art of Partnering. Rigsbee has over 1,000 published articles to
his credit and is a regular keynote presenter at corporate and trade
association conferences across North America.
|